Intraoral Dental Sensor Comparison Study

The data for this page will continually be updated. (Large resolution images may load slowly)

Background

Dental Intraoral Sensor

This study is being conducted by Dr. David Crane, a general dentist in Chippewa Falls, WI since 1967. His office is mostly digital including patient records, intraoral sensors, digital panoramic x-ray, and bar-coded supply management. Dr. Crane is a former partner in a business that sold hardware and software to medical and dental offices.

Making the choice of hardware is probably the most difficult decision when converting to digital x-rays. The selection of a digital pan is easier than the selection of intraoral sensors because digital pans are grouped more by cost, quality of images, and expandability. On the other hand there are many different intraoral sensors with many options, different imaging software, choices of integration into your practice management software, and choice of vendors. Demos by local salespeople will often provide high resolution images but will not reflect how they will appear on your computer or provide side-by-side comparisons with image quality of other brands.

Unbiased results will be presented on an ongoing basis as different sensors are tested. Comments or suggestions are welcome. You may also call us at 715-723-1662.

Method

A small program, called an extension, was downloaded from the Apteryx web site for each make of sensor. (See all the different sensors on the market). This, along with the drivers for each sensor, allowed us to use all of the sensors with our CliniView imaging software. (See all the imaging software made by Apteryx). The sensors were used for all patients by all staff members in three treatment rooms for at least two weeks. Three staff members were the subjects for the images shown in the chart. All images are untouched and only converted to JPG format from the CliniView raw format. Rinn sensor holders were used and the aiming ring always touched the patients face. Exposure ranges for all sensors were between .060 to .160 seconds.

Controls

Variables

Click here to see photos and review notes


SENSOR DATE OF
STUDY
TYPE SIZES STREET PRICE
#2 Inc USB
Warranty

Maintenance/
Repair cost

Software
DentiMax July 12, 2009 CCD #1, 2 $6,298 2 year limited Add $1,499 for unlimited 2 yr warranty, one time replacement DentiMax Digital Dental Imaging, sold separately, can be bundled
EVA Classic October 27, 2008 CMOS #1, 2 $5,882 3 year limited Unknown ProImage software sold separately
Gendex Visualix eHD January 20, 2009 CCD #1, 2 $8,395 2 year limited 5 yr extended limited costs $995 with $3,000 deductable. Buy a new one if you damage it. VixWin Platinum software sold separately, 2 year warranty
Instrumentarium SnapShot July 4, 2009 CMOS #1, 2 $7,800 2 year limited Add $995 for 5 year accidental damage with $1,895 deductable CliniView software included with lifetime support plus 5 licenses
Kodak 6100 June 10, 2010 CMOS #0, 1, 2, $xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
Schick CDR May 13, 2009 CMOS #0, 1, 2 $8,855 2 year
limited
Sensor replacement $2,300 with Service Club Eaglesoft imaging included, Service Club free 1st 2 yrs, then $995/yr


These images are high resolution and can be enlarged using Control++ in Windows
NAME OF SENSOR IMAGE FROM PATIENT #1 IMAGE FROM PATIENT #2 IMAGE FROM PATIENT #3
DentiMax dentimax_dc dentimax_cf dentimax_jt
EVA Classic eva_dc dental sensor image eva_cf dental sensor image  dental sensor image
Gendex Visualix gendex_dc gendex_cf dental sensor image gendex_jt dental sensor image
Instrumentarium
SnapShot
snapshot_dc dental sensor image instrumentarium snapshot snapshot_jt dental sensor image
Kodak 6100 kodak_dc_sensor image kodak_cf_sensor image kodak_jt_sensor image
Schick CDR schick_dc dental sensor image schick_cf dental sensor image schick_jt dental sensor image
       

Click here to see photos and review notes